Reflections on IDCC 2026

In February, Robin Rice and I ventured to Zagreb, Croatia, for the 20th International Digital Curation Conference. This year’s theme was ‘AI, austerity, and authoritarianism: contemporary challenges in digital curation’, which made for a very timely programme of presentations.

In her opening keynote, Dr. Antica Čulina discussed her fascinating research into the reproducibility crisis in Ecology and how Open Research practices can address it.

I attended most of the sessions focused on AI and machine learning, and heard about the different ways digital curators are trying out new applications of these technologies to automate research data management tasks. A popular theme of these sessions was using Large Language Models to fill in missing metadata and to provide automated feedback to researchers writing Data Management Plans. These use cases are both very appealing, but as the outputs of the tools still needed to be checked by human curators every time, the presenters weren’t sure whether these tools were saving or costing time. It was useful to hear different perspectives on creating tools for repository users versus for repository curators, and I’ll follow these projects with great interest. I also enjoyed Michael Groenendyk’s talk on using Large Language Models to detect data citations, which allows institutions to assess the impact of their researchers’ open datasets.

 

Me and Cassia Smith, beside her award winning poster! Photo by Robin Rice.

Cassia Smith and myself, beside her award winning poster! Photo by Robin Rice.

The closing keynote featured Dr. Lynda Kellam and Mikala Narlock from the Data Rescue Project, who reflected on the past year they spent preserving access to United States federal data and building a community that cares deeply about the integrity of the US government and its institutions.

DCC put on some excellent social events throughout the conference, including a drinks reception in the Emerald Ballroom at the historic Esplanade Hotel, and dinner and a beer tasting at The Garden Brewery & Taproom. I had so much fun meeting other digital curators from all around the world and sharing experiences and knowledge.

Overall, I highly recommend attending IDCC to anyone who’s interested in current issues in digital curation, and I hope I can go again in the future!

To read more about what went on at IDCC26, you can check out DCC’s summary here:

https://dcc.ac.uk/events/idcc26/summary

To see all the presentation slides and posters, visit the Zenodo page:

https://zenodo.org/communities/idcc26/

Evelyn Williams
Research Data Support Assistant
Research Data Service

DataShare Spotlight: A photographic record of a divided Berlin in the 1980’s

Some of the most widely used datasets in DataShare are the collections of photographs of tower blocks and mass housing, both in the UK and internationally, created by Miles Glendinning, Professor of Architectural Conservation in the Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture (ESALA). Recently, Miles deposited a number of new datasets to the DOCOMOMO International Mass Housing Archive collection, including recent research data-gathering exercises in Belgium, China, Chile, Italy and Morocco. Further to this, are two archives of photos documenting Berlin in the 1980’s. Covering both East and West Berlin, these images provide striking visual representations of the buildings, transport infrastructure and general urban environment of the time, revealing a fascinating glimpse into the DDR (Deutsche Demokratische Republik), the BRD (Bundesrepublik Deutschland) and the enforced division between them.

To help shine a light on this special set of images, I asked Miles to answer three questions regarding the creation of this dataset.

Mitte - Friedrichstrasse. (Nord-Sud S-Bahn), Sept 1982

Mitte – Friedrichstrasse. (Nord-Sud S-Bahn), Sept 1982 Photo credit: Miles Glendinning https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/8062

1 – What drew you to Berlin during this period?

I was drawn to visit East and West Berlin in 1982 by a curiosity to see first-hand what the Wall was like in its ‘mature’ state, and to experience, however briefly, the contrasting ways of life in the two parts of the city – East Berlin a would-be capital city with an alien entity adjoining its city core, and West Berlin a somewhat peaceful, even backwater-like island city-state divorced from the mainstream hubbub of West German life: at that stage, in the pre-Gorbachev era, there was no suspicion that the Iron Curtain only had a few more years of life, and the situation all seemed irreversibly settled in a strange sort of stagnant air immobility.

What particularly interested me were the quirky anomalies thrown up by the makeshift character of the division-line, including strange ‘exclaves’ such as Steinstücken – a few houses accessible by its own bus route through a narrow extrusion in the Wall), and the strange status of the S-Bahn (the local suburban rail network), whose lines in West Berlin were run indirectly by the DDR authorities, and had fallen into seemingly terminal decay and dereliction following many years of boycotts by West Berliners.

Several S-Bahn stations also featured bizarre border anomalies, such as the ‘door in the Wall’ that gave access to Wollankstraße station, and the underground/overground West-Berlin interchange and border crossing in the centre of East Berlin at Friedrichstraße.

Other infrastructural monuments of division and decay included the enormous DDR customs checkpoints complex newly built just north of ‘Checkpoint Charlie’, and later demolished immediately in 1990, or the disused Olympic Stadium bequeathed by the Nazi regime.

Gesundbrunnen station in Sept 1982

Wedding – Bf Gesundbrunnen – Sept 1982 view A – Photo credit: Miles Glendinning https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/8063

2 – Your images are documented with metadata of where they were taken, but beyond that, does looking at any of the photos bring back any particular memories?

The strongest memory brought back by looking at the photos is the sense of ‘suspended animation’ that was pervasive throughout the city, with some bustle in the ‘Ku’damm’ and ‘Alex’, but significant areas of dereliction and disuse everywhere, especially near the border, plus stereotypical ‘communist greyness’ throughout East Berlin, and a general feeling of relative lack of population and urban energy in both halves of the city.

The images of quiet decay and dereliction seem to evoke feelings akin to the ‘deploratio urbis’, or lamentation for lost greatness, felt by Renaissance and Romantic visitors among the ruins of classical Rome: looking at a 1982 photo such as that of the spectacularly overgrown wasteland of Gesundbrunnen station, what one saw was a vista of apparently irreversible decay, with no hint of the spectacular reversal that lay only a decade ahead.

From a modernist heritage perspective, however, many of the structures built during the division today seem of growing historical interest, including West-Berlin’s outer modern social housing complexes such as the Märkisches Viertel, or the extensive ‘Plattenbau’ complexes ubiquitous throughout East Berlin (on which see also the more recent images in the Docomomo International Mass Housing Archive, https://datashare.ed.ac.uk/handle/10283/2927 ).

Kreuzberg - Friedrichstrasse, Checkpoint Charlie, Sept 1982

Kreuzberg – Friedrichstrasse, Checkpoint Charlie, Sept 1982 Photo credit: Miles Glendinning https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/8063

3 – How do you envisage the images in the dataset being used?

As always, it’s rather difficult to predict the very varied ways in which images such as these could be used, but I imagine that they could be useful for scholarly exploitation by historians of 20th-century Germany or of its post-war built environments, or as a more popular level, by enthusiasts for ‘Cold War heritage’ or ‘Ostalgie’?

Many thanks to Miles for taking the time to respond so insightfully to the questions.

The items containing the Berlin photos can be found at the following links:

Berlin (East)

Berlin (West)

The wider collections of tower blocks in the UK and mass housing internationally can be found at:

Tower Block UK

DOCOMOMO International Mass Housing Archive

Keith Munro,
Research Data Support Assistant

Two upcoming Edinburgh data-related conferences

As we all settle into the new year, it is good to start filling the calendar with events that provide new insight, provide opportunities to interact with peers, offer the chance to share knowledge and to have an experience set apart from everyday work. To help with this, it is worth taking note of a couple of conferences coming up this year, hosted here at the University of Edinburgh.

Digital Research Conference 2026

On February 26th, the 2026 Digital Research Conference will take place at the Edinburgh Futures Institute. It brings together University of Edinburgh researchers and professional staff engaged in digital, data-intensive, and computational research to promote best practices, inspire collaboration, and stimulate discussions across various research fields.

Infographic showing date and title of the conference.

Attendees experience a diverse programme featuring keynote talks, interactive panels, hands-on workshops, and breakout sessions covering emerging trends, digital research skills, and innovative methodologies.

Registration is free but tickets are available only to University of Edinburgh Staff and PGR students: Registration link.

Edinburgh Open Research Conference 2026

On June 18th, the Edinburgh Open Research Conference 2026 will take place at 50 George Square and the call for submissions is now open.

This year’s call is based on the ambitious “Recommendation on Open Science”, produced by UNESCO, it recognises the broad scope and impact of Open Research – not just on knowledge production, but also on the world at large. Value driven and built around the values of Quality and Integrity, Collective Benefit, Equity and Fairness, and Diversity and Inclusion, the model provides a foundation for a strategic and principled path forward. Over the past year Edinburgh Open Research (EOR) have revamped their action plan and internal model at the University of Edinburgh to reflect this ambitious and expansive scope.

Infographic detailing the components of the UNESCO Model of Open Science

Image: UNESCO Model of Open Science, © UNESCO, 2024,
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO [14029] https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546

EOR’s new action plan has become more diverse and expansive than ever before, and their strategies going forward will be built upon this new perspective, taking into account their local context. To celebrate this positive step forward, this year’s conference will therefore delve into the various values, principles, and actions highlighted by UNESCO’s model.

The organisers are keen to hear from speakers from a diverse range of backgrounds (academic, professional services, and students) and research disciplines. They especially welcome contributions from early career researchers, junior professional services staff, and technicians.

The deadline for submissions is end of day – Friday 13th February 2026.

Registration and submission are open to all, further details and link to submissions: Edinburgh Open Research Conference 2026.

Members of the Research Data Service will be at both of these events, we hope to see you there!

Keith Munro,
Research Data Support Assistant