DataShare Spotlight: A photographic record of a divided Berlin in the 1980’s

Some of the most widely used datasets in DataShare are the collections of photographs of tower blocks and mass housing, both in the UK and internationally, created by Miles Glendinning, Professor of Architectural Conservation in the Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture (ESALA). Recently, Miles deposited a number of new datasets to the DOCOMOMO International Mass Housing Archive collection, including recent research data-gathering exercises in Belgium, China, Chile, Italy and Morocco. Further to this, are two archives of photos documenting Berlin in the 1980’s. Covering both East and West Berlin, these images provide striking visual representations of the buildings, transport infrastructure and general urban environment of the time, revealing a fascinating glimpse into the DDR (Deutsche Demokratische Republik), the BRD (Bundesrepublik Deutschland) and the enforced division between them.

To help shine a light on this special set of images, I asked Miles to answer three questions regarding the creation of this dataset.

Mitte - Friedrichstrasse. (Nord-Sud S-Bahn), Sept 1982

Mitte – Friedrichstrasse. (Nord-Sud S-Bahn), Sept 1982 Photo credit: Miles Glendinning https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/8062

1 – What drew you to Berlin during this period?

I was drawn to visit East and West Berlin in 1982 by a curiosity to see first-hand what the Wall was like in its ‘mature’ state, and to experience, however briefly, the contrasting ways of life in the two parts of the city – East Berlin a would-be capital city with an alien entity adjoining its city core, and West Berlin a somewhat peaceful, even backwater-like island city-state divorced from the mainstream hubbub of West German life: at that stage, in the pre-Gorbachev era, there was no suspicion that the Iron Curtain only had a few more years of life, and the situation all seemed irreversibly settled in a strange sort of stagnant air immobility.

What particularly interested me were the quirky anomalies thrown up by the makeshift character of the division-line, including strange ‘exclaves’ such as Steinstücken – a few houses accessible by its own bus route through a narrow extrusion in the Wall), and the strange status of the S-Bahn (the local suburban rail network), whose lines in West Berlin were run indirectly by the DDR authorities, and had fallen into seemingly terminal decay and dereliction following many years of boycotts by West Berliners.

Several S-Bahn stations also featured bizarre border anomalies, such as the ‘door in the Wall’ that gave access to Wollankstraße station, and the underground/overground West-Berlin interchange and border crossing in the centre of East Berlin at Friedrichstraße.

Other infrastructural monuments of division and decay included the enormous DDR customs checkpoints complex newly built just north of ‘Checkpoint Charlie’, and later demolished immediately in 1990, or the disused Olympic Stadium bequeathed by the Nazi regime.

Gesundbrunnen station in Sept 1982

Wedding – Bf Gesundbrunnen – Sept 1982 view A – Photo credit: Miles Glendinning https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/8063

2 – Your images are documented with metadata of where they were taken, but beyond that, does looking at any of the photos bring back any particular memories?

The strongest memory brought back by looking at the photos is the sense of ‘suspended animation’ that was pervasive throughout the city, with some bustle in the ‘Ku’damm’ and ‘Alex’, but significant areas of dereliction and disuse everywhere, especially near the border, plus stereotypical ‘communist greyness’ throughout East Berlin, and a general feeling of relative lack of population and urban energy in both halves of the city.

The images of quiet decay and dereliction seem to evoke feelings akin to the ‘deploratio urbis’, or lamentation for lost greatness, felt by Renaissance and Romantic visitors among the ruins of classical Rome: looking at a 1982 photo such as that of the spectacularly overgrown wasteland of Gesundbrunnen station, what one saw was a vista of apparently irreversible decay, with no hint of the spectacular reversal that lay only a decade ahead.

From a modernist heritage perspective, however, many of the structures built during the division today seem of growing historical interest, including West-Berlin’s outer modern social housing complexes such as the Märkisches Viertel, or the extensive ‘Plattenbau’ complexes ubiquitous throughout East Berlin (on which see also the more recent images in the Docomomo International Mass Housing Archive, https://datashare.ed.ac.uk/handle/10283/2927 ).

Kreuzberg - Friedrichstrasse, Checkpoint Charlie, Sept 1982

Kreuzberg – Friedrichstrasse, Checkpoint Charlie, Sept 1982 Photo credit: Miles Glendinning https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/8063

3 – How do you envisage the images in the dataset being used?

As always, it’s rather difficult to predict the very varied ways in which images such as these could be used, but I imagine that they could be useful for scholarly exploitation by historians of 20th-century Germany or of its post-war built environments, or as a more popular level, by enthusiasts for ‘Cold War heritage’ or ‘Ostalgie’?

Many thanks to Miles for taking the time to respond so insightfully to the questions.

The items containing the Berlin photos can be found at the following links:

Berlin (East)

Berlin (West)

The wider collections of tower blocks in the UK and mass housing internationally can be found at:

Tower Block UK

DOCOMOMO International Mass Housing Archive

Keith Munro,
Research Data Support Assistant

DataShare spotlight: Debates on slavery and abolition held by student debating societies at the University of Edinburgh, 1765-1870

The best part of my job is looking through the new datasets submitted to DataShare, our open-access data repository. One of the first datasets that gripped me was; Debates on slavery and abolition held by student debating societies at the University of Edinburgh, 1765-1870.

This dataset is really cool because as well as being a valuable resource for future research projects, it’s extremely interesting to read, even as someone who doesn’t know anything about historical research. This readability is what makes humanities dataset submissions so fun to process.

This dataset summarises debates on chattel slavery and abolition by two of the University’s debating societies during roughly the last hundred official years of the Transatlantic slave trade. It includes motions and outcomes of the debates, as well as information about the people participating and the positions they took.

It’s easy to tell ourselves that people in the past caused unimaginable harm because they didn’t know any better. Maybe this impulse is a form of self-preservation, a way to deny our ancestors’ agency to protect them – and ourselves – from blame. The dataset reminds us that even at the height of the slave trade there were many people publicly voicing their opposition. The data give us some insight into how these men understood their own complicity in slavery and their responsibility in upholding or abolishing it.

It’s interesting to see, for example, that some debate outcomes were pro-abolition, but against immediate abolition. Or how a debate on whether it would be sound policy to abolish the African slave trade had a unanimously pro-abolition outcome in 1792, yet full emancipation didn’t come for over forty years.

Sample from table of data

A preview of ‘University of Edinburgh Dialectic Society debates on slavery and abolition, 1792-1870’. From Buck, Simon; Frith, Nicola; Curry, Tommy. (2024). Debates on slavery and abolition held by student debating societies at the University of Edinburgh, 1765-1870 [text]. University of Edinburgh. Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/7841.

The dataset comes from The Decolonised Transformations Project which aims to take a critical look at the University’s complicity and investment in slavery and colonialism, confront the legacies of these choices, and make concrete recommendations to address present-day structural racism. The project is a great example of how Humanities research can be translated into a wide array of resources to maximise its utility and reach. As well as traditional outputs like publications and reports, the research team has published datasets, done podcasts, and held workshops and talks for the wider community.

Decolonised Transformations – Confronting the University’s Legacies of Slavery and Colonialism

The datasets have been downloaded multiple times since they were shared in November, so I’m sure other people are finding this data as interesting as I am.

Evelyn Williams
Research Data Support Assistant

DataShare spotlight: Human MotionLess Dataset (HuMoLs) and the creative potential of research data

For the second installment of the spotlight on DataShare blog posts, I would like to showcase a fascinating item containing videos of people not doing anything!

The dataset in question is titled “Human MotionLess Dataset (HuMoLs)” and was created by researchers Longfei Chan, Muhammad Ahmed Raza and Robert Fisher, who are based in the School of Informatics’ Institute of Perception Action and Behaviour. While on the face of it, people being still might not seem very dynamic, the research behind this dataset is trying to solve a difficult problem with a very useful outcome. Simply put, how do you tell when someone is lying still because they are doing something like sleeping, or if it is because they are unwell or have fallen? The videos in this dataset aim to try and train healthcare monitoring systems to help determine whether it is the former or the latter of these possibilities, with the priority being to uncover any critical medical conditions or to analyse chronic conditions.

A selection of still images taken from the videos in the dataset.

What struck me while reviewing the videos for submission was that beyond the usefulness of these videos to the research project, there was the potential for them to be adapted creatively. The videos have a deliberately “uncanny valley” aspect, due to using AI to deepfake participant’s faces in order to preserve their anonymity. The amusingly odd character to the videos made me imagine them being used in an Adam Curtis documentary, or in an Aphex Twin music video. Possibly even in an Adam Curtis documentary with Aphex Twin music over the top of it.

This raises the fascinating idea that there are rich sources of research data stored in open access repositories that could have a life beyond being reproducible, but could also be reused, repurposed and remixed into creative new pieces, adding value to both the research itself, and to the repositories where the affiliated data is stored. To demonstrate this possibility, I have edited some of the videos together, see below, and set them to music. The piece of music, “Redolescence” by Other Lands, has a dreamlike quality to it which both complements and recontextualises the videos into something beyond their originally intended use.

What other audio and visual materials are there contained in research data repositories waiting to be repurposed in a creative manner? Time (and much more talented creators than me) will tell!

The full dataset can be found on DataShare: Human MotionLess Dataset (HuMoLs)

The paper which the dataset supports: OPPH: A Vision-Based Operator for Measuring Body Movements for Personal Healthcare

Permission to use the music featured in this video was kindly granted by Gavin Sutherland, performing here under his artist name of Other Lands. The album which contains this track can be purchased on Bandcamp: Other Lands – Riddle of the Mode