{"id":329,"date":"2022-04-06T20:03:55","date_gmt":"2022-04-06T20:03:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/?p=329"},"modified":"2022-04-06T20:06:18","modified_gmt":"2022-04-06T20:06:18","slug":"true-crime-podcasts-finding-the-real-story-in-law-reports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/2022\/04\/06\/true-crime-podcasts-finding-the-real-story-in-law-reports\/","title":{"rendered":"True crime podcasts: finding the real story in law reports"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If you listen to true crime podcasts you may recently have heard <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/sounds\/play\/p0bx3g6m\"><strong>Bad People (BBC Sounds)<\/strong><\/a> report on the story of little Helen Priestley, a child from Aberdeen who was killed in 1934 in a case famously referred to as the <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scotsman.com\/arts-and-culture\/crime-scene-photos-murder-shocked-aberdeen-go-public-346354\">&#8216;Aberdeen Sack Murder&#8217;<\/a><\/strong>. The evidence from this case was analysed and presented in part by Dr Sydney Smith, Regius Professor of Forensic Medicine at the University of Edinburgh and a forefather of forensic pathology, who used bacteria from vomit and hairs found inside a sack to identify the suspect Jeannie Donald. The jury deliberated for only 18 minutes before returning a guilty verdict. This made Mrs Donald one of the first people in the world to be convicted on the basis of forensic evidence.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 625px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/i2-prod.aberdeenlive.news\/incoming\/article6514911.ece\/ALTERNATES\/s615b\/0_Helen-Priestly-murder-case-1934.jpg\" alt=\"Digitised version of the Daily Record front page from July 1934. Headline reads 'Woman condemned to hang: Jurywomen weep at sack trial verdict'. Photographs of Helen Priestly (victim, aged 8) and Jeannie Donald (accused) feature below the headline.\" width=\"615\" height=\"909\" \/><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Image of Daily Record newspaper dated Tuesday 24th July 1934.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Although there are some sources online to back up the podcast&#8217;s story (such as from\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.aberdeenlive.news\/news\/history\/remembering-murder-little-helen-priestly-6514765\"><strong>an article on Aberdeen Live<\/strong><\/a>, or an entry which might be useful for background reading on <a href=\"https:\/\/murderpedia.org\/female.D\/d\/donald-jeannie.htm\"><strong>Murderpedia<\/strong><\/a>), as a librarian with a world of Scottish legal resources at my fingertips I felt it was important to verify the reporting of the story with good academic resources. I was particularly interested in how the case was reported in Justiciary Cases, however when searching Westlaw I found that access to the archive of material online from 1934\/1935 is incomplete. If I were on-campus I&#8217;d be able to <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/discovered.ed.ac.uk\/permalink\/44UOE_INST\/7g3mt6\/alma9917331103502466\">visit the Law Library to find the item in print<\/a><\/strong>, and even though I&#8217;m working remotely I could request scans via the <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ed.ac.uk\/information-services\/library-museum-gallery\/using-library\/request-resources\/scan-and-deliver\">Scan &amp; Deliver service<\/a><\/strong>, however as this is just out of interest and not for research I thought I&#8217;d persevere online. Not to be deterred, I decided to try my luck with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk\/login?url=https:\/\/www.heinonline.org\/HOL\/Welcome\"><strong>HeinOnline<\/strong><\/a> as I know it provides good access to many historical resources for Scots Law.<\/p>\n<p>When I clicked through to Hein&#8217;s Scottish Legal History section and searched for &#8216;Jeannie Donald&#8217; in the text box the first article of commentary I found was by William Roughead<strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/heinonline-org.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk\/HOL\/Contents?handle=hein.journals\/jure46&amp;id=1&amp;size=2&amp;index=&amp;collection=stair\">Juridical Review 46 Jurid. Rev. (1934). <\/a><\/strong>While skimming through the case I began to wonder if there was a market for significant crime reports being read aloud as audiobooks rather than podcasts, as Roughead&#8217;s analysis of the case made for engaging reading!<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>MURDER has a magic of its own, its peculiar alchemy.<br \/>\nTouched by that crimson wand things base and<br \/>\nsordid, things ugly and of ill report, are transformed into<br \/>\nmatters wondrous, weird, and tragical. Dull streets<br \/>\nbecome fraught with mystery, commonplace dwellings<br \/>\nassume a sinister aspect, everyone concerned, howsoever<br \/>\nplain and ordinary, is invested with a new value and<br \/>\nimportance as the red light falls upon each.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Although I couldn&#8217;t locate more information from Session Cases or another legal report, the 46 pages of Roughead&#8217;s account certainly provided a great deal of detail. I also found from searching online that a PhD student in Manchester used Sydney Smith&#8217;s writing up of the case from 1940 in the <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/0032258X4001300304\"><strong>Police Journal 13, no.3 (1940): 273-87<\/strong> <\/a>as part of his thesis, and so was able to find further analysis of the case in that way. (Please note: The Police Journal is currently outside our subscription but if relevant for research it would be possible for the library to secure access using the <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ed.ac.uk\/information-services\/library-museum-gallery\/using-library\/request-resources\/ill\/ill-about\">Interlibrary Loan service.<\/a><\/strong>).<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re struggling to find good academic resources related to a case or legislation, you may find the following resources to be helpful:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/edinburgh-uk.libguides.com\/c.php?g=673145&amp;p=4849997\">Law Subject Guide: Online access to Ebooks and Law Reports<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ed.ac.uk\/information-services\/library-museum-gallery\/finding-resources\/library-databases\/databases-subject-a-z\/database-law\">Law databases page<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/media.ed.ac.uk\/media\/How+the+law+library+can+help+you+%28UG%29+Sept+2021\/1_1at0mpuu\/175663881\">How the Law Library can help you (video, 10 minutes)<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you feel that you&#8217;re familiar with these resources but need a bit more guidance, why not\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.events.ed.ac.uk\/index.cfm?eventssearch=literature+search+clinic+%28one-to-one+session%29+for+Law&amp;event=search&amp;eventStart=0&amp;eventProviderId=&amp;cw_inChannelLink=1&amp;cw_passThrough=marked\"><strong>book a one-to-one appointment with a law librarian.<\/strong>\u00a0<\/a>We offer bespoke 30 minute appointments to help you with your area of study; simply book the date and time that works best for you using the MyEd booking link. A week before the appointment date we will contact you to ask for information about your query or area of interest, and then we will arrange either a Teams call or a location to meet in person.<\/p>\n<p>If the appointment times listed don&#8217;t suit or you have any queries you&#8217;d like email assistance with, please contact us on <strong><a href=\"mailto:law.librarian@ed.ac.uk\">law.librarian@ed.ac.uk<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you listen to true crime podcasts you may recently have heard Bad People (BBC Sounds) report on the story of little Helen Priestley, a child from Aberdeen who was killed in 1934 in a case famously referred to as &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/2022\/04\/06\/true-crime-podcasts-finding-the-real-story-in-law-reports\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":163,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[10,4,6,7,9,5],"tags":[38,78,28,53,26,39],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pcADqd-5j","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/163"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=329"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":333,"href":"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329\/revisions\/333"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=329"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk\/lawlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=329"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}